The recent decision by "60 Minutes" to feature Marjorie Taylor Greene in a segment raises unsettling questions about journalistic responsibility and the potential consequences of granting a platform to individuals who espouse extreme ideologies.

Greene, known for her inflammatory rhetoric and controversial beliefs, has consistently pushed the boundaries of acceptable political discourse. Whether it's her support for QAnon conspiracies, her inflammatory remarks about minorities, or her downplaying of the January 6th insurrection, Greene's positions demonstrably undermine democratic norms and principles.

While "60 Minutes" touts a history of interviewing controversial figures, the choice of Greene seems to elevate her platform further and legitimize her dangerous views. It's not just the content of Greene's statements but the sheer volume of amplified lies that pose a tangible risk to the public discourse.

In an increasingly polarized political climate, it's crucial for media outlets to prioritize integrity and ethical considerations. Giving a platform to individuals who engage in deliberate misinformation, harmful rhetoric, and demonization of marginalized groups undermines the very foundation of a healthy democracy.

"60 Minutes", one of the preeminent news programs in the United States, needs to re-evaluate its judgment in featuring figures like Greene. Providing a stage to such polarizing individuals not only risks normalizing their dangerous ideologies but also serves as a disservice to the public. The media must hold individuals accountable for their rhetoric and prioritize the public good over sensationalized narratives.